သတင္းတို

“Burma” ဟုသာ ဆက္သံုးမည္ဟု ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ ေျပာ

| November 23, 2012 | Hits:1
  | |
Print This Post

တျခား အစိုးရမ်ားက ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံကို ယခင္စစ္အစိုးရ သတ္မွတ္ေခၚေဝၚခဲ့သည့္ အတိုင္း “Myanmar” ဟု သံုးႏႈန္းေနျခင္း အေပၚ စိတ္ပ်က္မိေၾကာင္း ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္က ေျပာဆိုလိုက္သည္။ “ျမန္မာျပည္သူေတြက သူတို႔ေခၚေစခ်င္တဲ့ အတိုင္း ဆံုးျဖတ္တဲ့ ကာလအထိ ဒီႏိုင္ငံကို က်မကေတာ့ “Burma” လို႔ပဲ အၿမဲ ရည္ညႊန္းေခၚဆိုမွာပါ” ဟု ေနျပည္ေတာ္တြင္ နယူးဇီလန္ ဝန္ႀကီးခ်ဳပ္ ဂြ်န္ကီးႏွင့္ ေတြ႔ဆံုစဥ္ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္က ေျပာဆိုေၾကာင္း သိရသည္။ ၾသစေၾတးလ် အေျခစိုက္ ဆစ္ဒနီ နံနက္ခင္း သံေတာ္ဆင့္ သတင္းစာ၏ ေဖာ္ျပခ်က္အရ ၾသစေၾတးလ်ႏွင့္ နယူးဇီလန္အစိုးရတို႔က မၾကာေသးမီကပင္ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံကို တရားဝင္ “Myanmar” အသိအမွတ္ျပဳ ေျပာင္းလဲသံုးႏႈန္းခဲ့ေၾကာင္း သိရသည္။

ေနာက္ဆံုးရ ႐ုပ္/သံမ်ား

11 Responses

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  1. bwetphyu November 23, 2012 - 3:56 pm

    I against burma, Myanmar – right

    Reply
  2. Jan Jan November 23, 2012 - 4:48 pm

    ၿပည္သူတစ္ေယာက္အေနနဲ ့ေတာင္းဆိုခ်င္ပါတယ္ အန္တီစု …
    ဘယ္ေလာက္မွေတာ့ နာမည္အသံုးအႏွုန္းေၾကာင့္သက္ေရာက္သြားၿခင္းမရွိဘူးဆိုေပမယ့္ Burma ဆိုတာ ကိုလိုနီေခတ္က အသံုးၿဖစ္လို ့မေခၚေစခ်င္ေတာ့ဘူး။ ၿပည္သူ တစ္ေယာက္အေနနဲ ့ဆႏၵပါ။ :)

    Reply
    • Kg November 23, 2012 - 11:57 pm

      Right. Burma represent mainly bamar ethnic. So myanmar is most favourable term for our country. In addition, it is created by british colonists. We are now independent nation. So, please stop calling that name. This is against our honour. I wonder why she still want to accept that name. Because the military junta created the new name? she still had anti military mind set? If so, i feel sorry. This is not the time for internal conflict. This is the time to rebuild trust between our people, strengthen our economy and living standard. This is time to raise our national honour.

      Reply
  3. mr TM November 23, 2012 - 8:25 pm

    နိုင္ငံတနိုင္ငံအတြက္(ဘယ္ေလာက္မွေတာ့နာမည္အသံုးအနံွုးေၾကာင့္သက္ေရာက္သြားၿခင္းမရွိဘူးဆိုရင္)လူမ်ိဳးတမ်ိဳးအတြက္ၾကေတာ့ဘာေၾကာင့္သက္ေရာက္မွုရွိရတာလဲ။ဒီမိုကေရစီေခတ္ မွာကိုလိုနီစနစ္မရွိသင့္ေတာ့ပါဘူး။

    Reply
  4. Throne November 24, 2012 - 1:30 am

    I never accept these name,”Burma”as a ethnic one because of all ethnic group survive in Myanmar,not only Burma who has been noticed a Majority and is known Burmese, not Myanmar by all over the world.what is different Burma and Myanmar?
    firstly, without portraying a picture of the country scenario which is mentioned both the two names are same but as if we recognize my country named as BURMA where community innocent people are only Burma. Sure to be example that if i visit to oversea where foreigner will ask ” where are you from” i easily speak ” i am Myanmar” but i never talk Burma Because of i am no Burma.
    secondly, we researched name BURMA that had absorbed and undermined to society, cultural and increasing populations of ethnic.So my country present BURMA populations is most increasing and Ethnic populations is lower and eroded continuously as silent ethnic cleansing.
    thirdly, we had to be remorse on Penglong agreement so we didn’t believe Burma leader and looked at critique.Burma people look like ethnic people but for example some NLD leader were very sensitive talking about Burma chronicle
    as their head were from side to side that i remarked them as chauvinist.
    finally, i love this country Myanmar and all people and always proud of my land as big areas, beautiful land, lot of resources, going on Democracy that is owned by unity. Myanmar, no ethnic region, is weaken so our main key is unity.
    what is my essential democracy leader creating problem and pushing to ethnic groups again to appear revolution to separate Myanmar.?
    I don’t like this name Burma .

    Reply
  5. kyawseinwim November 24, 2012 - 6:58 am

    both right Burma or Myanmar
    ္

    Reply
  6. Aung Kyaw Nyunt November 24, 2012 - 5:41 pm

    I am really sorry to hear that ASSK wants to stick BURMA given by Colonial British instead MYANMAR. Yes, MYANMAR was the name of the country evolved during the Military ruling, however we have to reason ourselves it was acceptable or not. We should not reject suddenly because of the adoption during the dictator ruling. Majority of the people may like the name MYANMAR. If this is considered controversial, this can be assessed legally in the parliament.

    Reply
  7. mr TM November 24, 2012 - 7:18 pm

    လြတ္လပ္ေရးရကတဲကၿမန္မာနိုင္ငံကိုအဂ္လိပ္လိုUnion Of Burma လို့သံုးၿပီးၿမန္မာလိုၿပည္ ေတာင္စုၿမန္မာနိုင္ငံေတာ္လို့သံုးခဲ့တာပါ၊ International အသိုင္းအဝိုင္းမွာBurma လို့ေဒၚစုသံုးတာဘာမွားသလဲ၊ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္ေအာင္ဆန္းသံုးခဲ့တဲ့ၿပည္ေတာင္စုလိုအဓိပ္ပါယ္ေပၚတဲ့အ လံကိုဗိုလ္ေနဝင္းကဆိုရွယ္လစ္အလံနဲ့လဲခဲ့တယ္၊အဲဒီအလံကိုဗိုလ္သန္းေရြွကေဒၚၾကိဳင္ၾကိဳင္ ေပးတဲ့……..အစမွာၾကယ္ၿဖဴတလံုးတပ္ၿပီးအလံေထာင္ေပးခဲ့တယ္။အဲဒီအလံကိုမင္းတို့ အေလးၿပဳေနၾကတာဘဲ၊မင္းတို့မွာသတၱိမရွိဘူးေဒၚစုမွာသတၱိရွိလို့ Burma လို့သံုးေနတာေဒၚစုသံုးထားတဲ့စကားလံုးကိုၿပန္ၾကည့္ဦစို့(ၿမန္မာၿပည္သူေတြကသူတို့ေခၚဆိုခ်င္တဲ့အတိုင္းဆံုးၿဖတ္တဲ့ကာလအထိက်မကေတာ့Burma လို့ဘဲအၿမဲရည္ညြွန္းေခၚဆိုမွာပါ)ၿပည္သူေတြရဲ့အဆံုးအၿဖတ္ကိုတန္ဘိုးထားတာပါ။

    Reply
  8. ကိုေဒါသ November 24, 2012 - 11:38 pm

    ကဲ..ေတာ္ၾကပါေတာ့ဗ်ာ။ ျမန္မာျဖစ္ျဖစ္၊ ဗားမားျဖစ္ျဖစ္ တိုင္းျပည္ရဲ႕ဆိုးေမြ၊ေကာင္းေမြေတြေၾကာင့္ က်ဳပ္တို႕ျပည္ကို ကမာၻကလည္းသိေနၾကေလာက္ပါျပီ။ UK,GB,England,Britain တ့ဲ။ ျပီးေတာ့ America,US,USA တ့ဲ။ Holland,Netherland တ့ဲ…ကဲဘာေျပာၾကဦးမလဲ။ ကိုယ္ၾကိဳက္သလိုသာေခၚၾကပါစို႕ရယ္။ ဘာမဟုတ္တ့ဲ စကားလံုးနဲ႕အက်အနေကာက္ေနၾကမ့ဲအစား တိုင္းျပည္တိုးတက္ေရးကိုပဲ အာရုံစိုက္ၾကပါစို႕။ တကတဲ…ရႈပ္ေနတာပဲ။

    Reply
  9. ေကာင္းေစခ်င္ November 26, 2012 - 11:37 pm

    ျမန္မာကိုျမန္မာလို႕ေခၚတာဘာမ်ားနာေနရတာလဲဗ်ာ၊ရန္ကုန္ကို RangoonအစားYangonလို႕ေခၚတာအဆင္ေျပအားလံုးလက္ခံေနတာပဲ၊စစ္အစိုးရေခတ္ကဘာလုပ္လုပ္ဆန္႕က်င္မယ္ဆိုၿပီးလုပ္ရာကေနဒီကိစၥျဖစ္လာရတာ၊ အခုထိ အရစ္မရွည္သင့္ေတာ့ပါ။
    စစ္အစိုးရလုပ္တာေကာင္းတာရွိရင္လည္းယူသင့္ပါတယ္။Myanmarလို႕ႏိုင္ငံတကာကလည္း
    လက္ခံေနပါၿပီ၊ India မွာလည္း Calcutta ကိုKholcutta လို႕သံုးေနပါၿပီ။

    Reply